Kommentaarid on avaldatud lugejate poolt ja nende sisu ei ole muudetud. Seega ei pruugi kommentaariumis tehtud avaldused ühtida toimetuse seisukohtadega.Lääne Elul on õigus ebasobilikud kommentaarid kustutada.
1 Kommentaar
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Elena
10 aastat tagasi
In modern terms, I don’t think the deisicon the Anti-Nephi-Lehis made was a covenant. As per a million seminary and Sunday School lessons, a covenant is a bargain offered by God that specifies certain obligations on our part and on His part. The Book of Mormon text (see Alma 24), by contrast, makes clear that the deisicon of the Anti-Nephi-Lehis was initiated by their king.Furthermore, no element of the text suggests that God made any promises in conjunction with this deisicon by the Anti-Nephi-Lehis. This wasn’t the kind of two-way, divinely-initiated deal we call a covenant these days; it was… Loe rohkem »
In modern terms, I don’t think the deisicon the Anti-Nephi-Lehis made was a covenant. As per a million seminary and Sunday School lessons, a covenant is a bargain offered by God that specifies certain obligations on our part and on His part. The Book of Mormon text (see Alma 24), by contrast, makes clear that the deisicon of the Anti-Nephi-Lehis was initiated by their king.Furthermore, no element of the text suggests that God made any promises in conjunction with this deisicon by the Anti-Nephi-Lehis. This wasn’t the kind of two-way, divinely-initiated deal we call a covenant these days; it was… Loe rohkem »